HT7 BREAKING – IRANIAN PARLIAMENT APPROVES THE CLOSURE OF THE! See More

In recent days, the delicate equilibrium of the Middle East has faced a significant challenge, drawing the intense focus of the international community. Reports originating from Tehran indicate that the Iranian Parliament has approved a measure concerning the potential closure of a vital maritime passage. While the specific details regarding the implementation of this measure remain under review and are subject to further administrative and governmental procedures, the mere announcement has sent shockwaves through global energy markets, shipping industries, and the highest levels of diplomatic circles.

At the heart of this escalating tension is the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow yet extraordinarily consequential channel that connects the Persian Gulf to the open seas. Despite its limited physical width, the strait serves as a central artery for the global economy. Every day, a staggering portion of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports transit through this route, solidifying its status as arguably the most strategically vital maritime corridor on the planet. Because many of the world’s primary energy-producing nations depend on this passage to reach their international customers, any credible threat to its uninterrupted transit creates immediate and profound anxiety across the globe. Refiners, shipping conglomerates, insurance giants, and sovereign governments are currently monitoring every development with meticulous care, fully aware that a disruption here could trigger a cascade of economic uncertainty and surging costs worldwide.

One of the most immediate indicators of geopolitical friction in the modern era is the volatility of the financial markets. Analysts have observed that commodity markets, specifically oil futures, often react with high sensitivity well before official government policy responses are even finalized. In this instance, the political signaling alone has been enough to stir the markets. Energy experts emphasize that the mere possibility of restricted access creates a “risk premium” that drives up the price of crude oil, shipping insurance, and freight costs. These increases are not necessarily caused by a physical blockade but by the pervasive uncertainty surrounding the future of supply. For the average consumer, this market behavior translates into tangible pressure: higher fuel prices at the pump, increased costs for transporting goods, and general inflationary pressure on a wide range of everyday products.

Beyond the immediate economic tremors, the situation presents a maze of complex legal and strategic challenges. International maritime law is governed by a series of agreements, such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which are designed to guarantee the freedom of navigation through international straits. Any action that challenges this legal framework is viewed as a significant provocation, often prompting coordinated diplomatic or even naval responses from a coalition of nations. Security analysts looking for historical context often point to previous “Tanker Wars” or periods of regional friction where naval patrols were intensified to maintain the flow of commerce. From a military perspective, these scenarios require immense preparation; defense experts stress that deterrence and open lines of communication are essential to preventing a fatal miscalculation that could lead to broader conflict.

The interconnectedness of the 21st-century economy ensures that a decision made in a single parliament can influence manufacturing hubs, consumer spending, and the stability of developing nations halfway across the world. This reality has reignited a global conversation about energy security and the necessity of diversification. Countries that have invested in alternative energy sources, varied trade routes, and robust strategic petroleum reserves are naturally better equipped to absorb these types of geopolitical shocks. Over the last decade, diversification has evolved from a theoretical policy goal into a survival strategy for nations wary of their dependence on a few key transit points.

While the public headlines are dominated by official statements and legislative votes, a substantial amount of critical work is being conducted in the shadows of quiet diplomacy. Governments across various continents are reportedly engaging in intense discussions aimed at clarifying intentions and exploring pathways toward de-escalation. Diplomacy in such high-stakes environments is a grueling process of balancing national interests against international expectations. History has repeatedly shown that sustained, behind-the-scenes communication is often the most effective tool for preventing regional tensions from spiraling into global crises. In this effort, international monitoring agencies play a vital role by providing verified data that can help dispel the misinformation that often flourishes during times of crisis.

The digital age has introduced a new layer of complexity to these events: the rapid spread of commentary and speculation. In the current climate, it is essential for investors and the public to distinguish between official state policy and the hyperbolic rhetoric that often populates social media. False or exaggerated claims can artificially amplify market panic and public anxiety, making measured and transparent communication from credible institutions more important than ever.

Looking back at past periods of tension in the Strait of Hormuz reveals several recurring lessons. First, energy markets are inherently reactive to the perception of risk, regardless of whether that risk is fully realized. Second, prolonged periods of uncertainty often cause more widespread economic damage than short, contained disruptions. Finally, history demonstrates that coordinated, international responses are far more effective at maintaining regional stability than unilateral actions taken by any single power. These lessons are currently informing the contingency plans being reviewed by world leaders as they evaluate their strategic reserves and reinforce their maritime partnerships.

It is crucial to emphasize that a parliamentary vote in Iran does not equate to an immediate physical closure of the waterway. The implementation of such a measure would require a series of further legal and administrative steps, and many observers suggest that this move may be a form of strategic signaling—an attempt to exert leverage in broader negotiations—rather than a definitive policy shift toward immediate action. Nevertheless, the situation serves as a stark reminder of the concentrated vulnerabilities that exist within our global systems. A single narrow stretch of water continues to hold the power to influence prices, policies, and perceptions across every continent.

Ultimately, this development illustrates the deep-seated interdependence of the modern world. Energy security, international law, and economic stability are no longer isolated concerns; they are inextricably linked. Decisions made within national borders can reverberate through global financial markets and affect household budgets across the globe. As the international community continues to monitor the situation, the focus remains on the preservation of the commerce and cooperation that underpins the global economy. The events of the coming days will serve as a crucial test of the resilience of our international systems and our collective ability to navigate a world where the stakes of miscalculation are higher than ever.

 

The Woman Who Reached 122: Her Surprising Habits and Remarkable Longevity

Jeanne Louise Calment is remembered worldwide as the longest-lived human being ever verified through complete and carefully examined documentation. Born on February 21, 1875, in the warm and historic town of Arles in southern France, she lived an exceptional 122 years and 164 days, finally passing away on August 4, 1997.

Her life continues to fascinate scientists, historians, medical researchers, and the general public because her longevity was accompanied by a personality and lifestyle unlike any other. Jeanne’s story is supported by a vast collection of reliable records, including birth certificates, marriage documents, census entries, legal files, and extensive photographic evidence. Experts in demography and longevity have studied these materials for decades and agree without hesitation that Jeanne Calment holds the undisputed record for the longest confirmed human lifespan.

5656567567

The Guinness World Records recognizes her as the oldest verified person in history, and she remains the only individual whose age has been confirmed beyond 119 years. Her extraordinary lifespan stands in a category of its own, representing a rare phenomenon that modern science continues to explore. Jeanne’s life stretched across three separate centuries, allowing her to witness technological, cultural, and political transformations that reshaped the world in ways few people could ever imagine.

She was born during a period marked by a largely pre-industrial France, when electricity was still a novelty and the nation was recovering from the Franco-Prussian War. By the time she reached the end of her life in 1997, the globe had endured two world wars, entered the space age, connected through telephones and computers, and taken its first steps into the digital era. She saw the invention of the light bulb, observed the building of the Eiffel Tower, and lived long enough to hear discussions about the internet. Her perspective on history spanned eras that most individuals only read about.

What makes Jeanne’s story even more intriguing is the unexpected nature of her lifestyle. Many people attribute long life to strict diet rules, intense physical training, or the complete avoidance of indulgence. Jeanne’s habits seemed to follow a different path. She loved chocolate—often consuming more than two pounds weekly—and enjoyed desserts with enthusiasm. She drank wine, especially port wine, and remained loyal to cigarettes from the age of 21 until she reached 117. Despite these choices, she maintained remarkable health and avoided many of the conditions commonly associated with aging.

Her resilience suggests that longevity arises from a combination of genetic strengths, environmental factors, emotional wellbeing, and lifestyle balance. Even with her indulgences, she stayed active. Jeanne rode her bicycle well into her nineties and continued walking around Arles long after many peers had become fully dependent on assistance. At 100 years old, she personally visited homes across her town to thank people for birthday wishes. This habit of staying socially connected, physically active, and mentally engaged may have played an important role in her extraordinary vitality.

Jeanne’s humor was another defining feature of her life. She had a relaxed, lighthearted way of moving through challenges and often used jokes to keep stress from affecting her. On her 120th birthday, she told reporters, “I see badly, I hear badly, I can’t feel anything, but everything is fine.” Her outlook reflected an emotional resilience that researchers now associate with a slower aging process. Gerontologists believe that people who manage stress effectively may protect themselves from chronic inflammation, cellular aging, and other physical consequences linked to long-term worry.

Her physician and biographers have emphasized that her calm approach to life appeared nearly instinctive. She focused on what could be controlled and released what could not, avoiding unnecessary tension. Modern studies increasingly support the idea that emotional wellbeing, social connection, and purpose play a central role in health and longevity.

Genetic factors likely contributed as well. Research on supercentenarians shows that many possess rare genetic markers related to lower inflammation, stronger cardiovascular function, and enhanced DNA repair. Jeanne’s exceptional resistance to age-related diseases suggests she may have carried biological traits that protected her in ways scientists are still trying to understand.

She remained mentally sharp far longer than most people her age. Jeanne recalled details from as early as the late 1800s and continued sharing stories with visitors, journalists, and researchers. Cognitive engagement—reading, talking with others, and staying curious—is strongly linked to long-term brain health. Jeanne’s active mind reflected a lifetime of learning, conversation, and community involvement.

Her presence fascinated the media, who documented her humor, charm, and unique perspective. These interviews and photographs contributed to her status as a cultural symbol of endurance and human possibility. She became a figure who inspired discussions about aging gracefully and living fully.

By the time she reached her final years, Jeanne had already surpassed every known record of human lifespan. She lived independently until 110 before moving into a care facility, where she continued to socialize, enjoy small pleasures, and maintain her sense of humor. When she passed away at 122, she left behind more than a record—she left a legacy of insight into the human spirit.

Jeanne Calment’s life demonstrates that longevity is shaped by more than food choices or exercise routines. It is influenced by genetics, emotional resilience, community, curiosity, moderate enjoyment, and a peaceful approach to life’s challenges. Her story continues to inspire people who seek healthy aging, reminding the world that a long life can be filled with joy, connection, humor, and meaning.

 

UPDATE – Three US F-15s Shot Down By Kuwaiti Air Defenses!

In the pre-dawn shadows of a high-stakes military theater, a moment of profound confusion in the skies over a key partner nation highlighted the terrifying fragility of international coordination during rapid-fire operations. Six American aircrew members were forced to make split-second decisions to eject from their cockpits when three U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft were lost during what should have been a routine defensive engagement. While initial rumors on the ground suggested a hostile strike, preliminary reports quickly clarified a more complex and tragic reality: the jets were not brought down by enemy forces, but were mistakenly targeted by allied air defense systems in the chaotic fog of an active campaign.

The incident took place during an intense phase of Operation Epic Fury, a multi-national effort designed to neutralize missile launches, unmanned aerial vehicles, and other emerging aerial threats linked to a wider regional conflict. In the pitch-black urgency of the mission, air defense batteries—tasked with shielding the region from incoming aggression—reportedly misidentified the returning American aircraft. The systems, programmed to react with lethal speed to any perceived threat, failed to recognize the Strike Eagles as “friendly,” leading to a catastrophic failure of the very protective umbrella they were designed to provide.

Despite the loss of three sophisticated airframes, the outcome was spared from being a total tragedy by the survival of all six aviators. Each crew member managed to eject safely and was recovered by rapid-response search and rescue teams. Military leadership later pointed to their survival as a testament to the rigorous emergency training and survival procedures drilled into every member of the Air Force. While the personnel are safe, the operational setback is significant, representing a loss of critical assets at a time when the region’s stability is on a knife-edge.

The narrative surrounding the event was almost immediately contested in the digital sphere. Within hours of the crash, state-aligned media outlets from Iran began circulating claims of responsibility, framing the incident as a decisive blow dealt by their own defense forces against the United States. American commanders were quick to dismantle these claims, providing data that indicated the aircraft were deep within allied-controlled airspace and had been engaged by systems belonging to a partner nation. The rejection of the hostile narrative shifted the focus from international retaliation to a rigorous internal investigation into how such a monumental error could occur within a coalition of allies.

At the heart of the ongoing inquiry is the failure of the Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) protocols. In the modern era, military aviation relies on a digital handshake between aircraft and ground-based radar. IFF technology, integrated radar networks, and shared data links are supposed to create a seamless, transparent map of the skies, allowing different nations to operate in the same airspace without risk to one another. When these systems function as intended, they form an impenetrable shield. However, when technical glitches, communication delays, or human errors occur under the crushing pressure of combat, the technology can inadvertently turn a protector into a predator.

Investigative teams from both the United States and the partner nation involved are currently examining a range of potential triggers for the misidentification. They are looking into whether technical malfunctions in the IFF transponders prevented the aircraft from “squawking” the correct codes, or if the intense electronic warfare environment of Operation Epic Fury created enough radar clutter to mask the identity of the Strike Eagles. Furthermore, the timing of communication between the aircrews and the ground-based defense operators is being scrutinized to see if a lapse in situational awareness played a role in the decision to fire.

Incidents of mistaken targeting, often termed “friendly fire” or “blue-on-blue” engagements, remain one of the most feared aspects of coalition warfare. While rare, they historically occur during periods of extreme threat saturation, when radar operators have only seconds to distinguish between a hostile missile and a friendly jet returning from a mission. The episode has forced a moment of somber reflection for commanders overseeing the operation, emphasizing that even the most advanced technological safeguards cannot entirely eliminate the human and mechanical risks inherent in a combat zone.

The incident also reveals a broader, more uncomfortable reality about the nature of modern coalition warfare. Today’s campaigns often involve a dense, overlapping grid of aircraft, radar arrays, and missile batteries from several different nations. Maintaining a “Common Tactical Picture” requires near-perfect synchronization across different languages, cultures, and hardware manufacturers. This case demonstrates that the smallest misinterpretation of a signal or a delay in a data packet can lead to consequences that are measured not only in the loss of multi-million dollar equipment but in the erosion of trust between strategic partners.

Military analysts suggest that the investigation will likely lead to sweeping adjustments in operational procedures. This may include the implementation of more robust “dead zones” where air defenses are prohibited from firing without secondary human verification, or upgrades to the software that manages integrated defense networks. The focus is not merely on assigning blame to a specific operator or technician, but on understanding how systemic stress and the speed of modern combat affect the decision-making cycle. The goal is to build a more resilient system that can withstand the “friction” of war that Carl von Clausewitz famously described.

For the time being, officials from both nations have been careful to present a united front, stressing that the military partnership remains intact and that the investigation is a collaborative, transparent effort. They maintain that the shared goal of regional security far outweighs the fallout of a single, albeit severe, operational error. Cooperation in Operation Epic Fury continues, even as the lessons of this pre-dawn disaster are being integrated into future flight plans.

Ultimately, the skies over the region remain crowded and dangerous. As the investigation moves forward, it serves as a stark reminder of the immense stakes involved in every radar track and identification code. In an environment where dozens of signals interact in the span of a few heartbeats, the difference between safety and catastrophe often rests on a single digital bit. The focus remains on ensuring that the systems designed to protect allied forces are fortified so that such a tragic confusion never repeats itself, ensuring that the next time a pilot returns from a mission, they are greeted by an ally, not a missile.

 

Jalapeño Popper Casserole

This low-carb, keto-friendly bake captures all the flavors of a jalapeño popper—creamy, cheesy, and spicy—combined with hearty ground beef for a filling meal.

 

Jalapeño Popper Casserole

Ingredients:

INGREDIENTS	AMOUNT
Ground beef	1 lb
Cream cheese, softened	8 oz
Shredded cheddar cheese (divided)	1 cup
Shredded mozzarella cheese (divided)	1 cup
Canned diced jalapeños, drained	4 oz
Mayonnaise	1/2 cup
Garlic powder	1 tsp
Onion powder	1 tsp
Paprika	1/2 tsp
Salt and black pepper	To taste
Green onions, chopped	1/4 cup

---

How To Make Jalapeño Popper Casserole:

Step 1: Preheat: Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C). Lightly grease a 9×13 inch baking dish.

 

Step 2: Brown the Beef: In a large skillet, cook the 1 lb of ground beef over medium heat until it is fully browned. Drain off any excess fat from the pan.

 

Step 3: Create the Cream Base: In a medium mixing bowl, combine the 8 oz of softened cream cheese, 1/2 cup mayonnaise, 1 tsp garlic powder, 1 tsp onion powder, 1/2 tsp paprika, and salt and pepper to taste. Stir until the mixture is smooth and well blended.

Step 4: Add Flavor and Cheese: Stir the 4 oz of diced jalapeños, 1/2 cup of the cheddar cheese, and 1/2 cup of the mozzarella cheese into the cream cheese mixture.

Step 5: Mix and Assemble: Add the cooked ground beef into the bowl and stir until it is thoroughly combined with the creamy cheese sauce. Transfer the mixture to your prepared baking dish and spread it out in an even layer.

Step 6: Top and Bake: Sprinkle the remaining 1/2 cup of cheddar and 1/2 cup of mozzarella over the top of the casserole. Bake for 25–30 minutes until the cheese is melted, bubbly, and slightly golden.

Step 7: Garnish and Serve: Let the casserole rest for about 5 minutes after removing it from the oven. Garnish with the 1/4 cup of chopped green onions and serve.

 

House Passes Bill Lowering Age Suspects Can Be Charged As Adults In DC

The Republican-led House has approved two critical bills aimed at curbing juvenile crime in Washington, D.C., and is scheduled to take up two additional related measures in the near future.

Advertisement

The D.C. CRIMES Act lowers the maximum age for trying offenders as juveniles from 24 to 18. It also requires sentences to match adult mandatory minimums and directs the city to publish public data on youth crime.

The second bill, the Juvenile Sentencing Reform Act, permits minors as young as 14 to be tried as adults for serious offenses. While both measures drew some Democratic support, the Reform Act passed by a slimmer margin than the CRIMES Act.

“Fully grown legal adults in the District of Columbia can receive sentences meant for children. That is simply insane,” said CRIME Act sponsor Rep. Byron Donalds, a Florida Republican.

The legislation is part of a broader package of about a dozen House measures advanced as President Trump deployed the National Guard and called on federal agencies, including the DEA and ICE, to address violent crime and illegal immigration in Washington, D.C.

Advertisement

Bills that pass the House will head to the Republican-controlled Senate, where their prospects remain unclear. In 2023, however, the Senate did approve a House measure blocking the District from easing criminal penalties — a bill later signed by then-President Joe Biden.

“I support D.C. Statehood and home-rule, but I don’t support some of the changes D.C. Council put forward over the Mayor’s objections such as lowering penalties for carjackings,” Biden tweeted.

Advertisement

District residents elect their own local lawmakers, but under the 1973 Home Rule Act, Congress retains broad oversight of the D.C. government.

According to reports, the two bills set for House consideration Wednesday would permit police to physically pursue suspects in certain cases and curb the District’s role in approving local judicial appointments — further fueling debate over the city’s criminal justice autonomy.

Trump last year called up elements of the DC National Guard and surged federal agents into the nation’s capital in a bid to drive down criminal activity.

In the first week after the White House assumed control of Washington, D.C.’s police force, the city recorded a modest drop in reported crime but a sharp increase in immigration-related arrests, according to a CNN analysis of government data.

For the week beginning August 12 — the first full week under federal control — property crimes fell by about 19 percentcompared to the week prior, while violent crime dropped 17 percent, based on the most recent Metropolitan Police Department statistics.

The trends varied by category. Robberies and car break-ins fell by more than 40 percent, while thefts remained flat. Burglary cases rose 6 percent, and assaults with a dangerous weapon increased 14 percent. Two homicides occurred during the period, consistent with recent weeks, though none have been reported since August 13.

Federal agencies have embedded with local police, assisting in arrests, searches, and warrant executions while patrolling the city in unmarked vehicles, CNN noted further.

At the same time, immigration enforcement surged. Since August 7, federal officials have arrested about 300 individuals in the district without legal immigration status — more than ten times the typical weekly number of ICE arrests in the city, CNN found.

In response to CNN’s report, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stated that the media was attempting to dismiss the “exceptional results” of Trump’s efforts in Washington, D.C.

“The drops in crime are not ‘moderate,’ they are life-changing for the countless of DC residents and visitors who have not been murdered, robbed, carjacked, or victims of overall violent crime in the last week,” Jackson said. “The priority of this operation remains getting violent criminals off the streets — regardless of immigration status.”

 

Alleged Gang Member Arrested After Stealing Rifle From FBI Vehicle

A federal criminal complaint was filed Friday against a Minneapolis man accused of breaking into a Federal Bureau of Investigation vehicle and stealing a rifle during civil unrest in North Minneapolis earlier this month, authorities said.

Advertisement

Thirty-three-year-old Raul Gutierrez of Minneapolis was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm and theft of government property in federal court, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota announced. Gutierrez is expected to make his initial federal court appearance in the coming days.

Federal authorities said Gutierrez is a known member of the Latin Kings gang with a documented history of involvement in trafficking fentanyl and methamphetamine. DEA officials identified him as the individual seen in open-source videos removing the rifle from the FBI vehicle after it was left at the scene of unrest.

“Gutierrez is known at DEA as a violent criminal with a history involving fentanyl and methamphetamine drug trafficking and distribution,” Drug Enforcement Administration Omaha Field Division Special Agent in Charge Dustin Gillespie said.

Advertisement

“In support of this investigation, DEA identified him as the individual seen breaking into an FBI vehicle on January 14. The combined efforts of federal law enforcement agencies and the Violent Offender Task Force led to the swift arrest and removal of a Latin King member that instilled fear and pushed poisons into our communities,” Gillespie added.

Advertisement

U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen stated, “Despite the incitement of violence against federal law enforcement by local officials, which resulted here in the theft of a firearm from an FBI vehicle and the destruction of government property, this United States Attorney’s Office and Department of Justice will always put the public safety of Americans first. This alleged gang member, who is a previously convicted felon, is a danger to the community and this case is an indictment of the weak-on-crime policies promoted by the Mayor and Governor.”

The alleged incident occurred on Jan. 14 as FBI personnel were providing support to the Department of Homeland Security in an operation in Minneapolis that included the use of force in an arrest attempt, according to the press release. As agents were forced to temporarily abandon their vehicles and equipment, individuals in the crowd broke into at least one unmarked FBI vehicle and removed federal property, including a Colt M16A1 rifle and related accessories.

“There is a clear, bright line between peaceful protest and lawless destruction,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Jarrad Smith of FBI Minneapolis. “Stealing, damaging, and destroying federal property endangers the community and jeopardizes the safe and peaceful exercise of First Amendment rights. TheFBI will never tolerate interference in law enforcement activities. Together with ATF, DEA, and the invaluable partnership of all our federal, state, and local law enforcement allies, FBI Minneapolis will ensure public safety and that those engaging in violent and destructive behavior will be identified and will face justice.”

Authorities said the theft was captured on video, prompting investigators from the FBI, DEA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the Hennepin County Violent Offender Task Force to identify and locate the suspect. Surveillance led to Gutierrez’s apprehension after he and an accomplice fled from a tow truck during an attempted traffic stop.

Federal immigration enforcement operations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), meanwhile, continued across Minnesota on Tuesday amid protests, political pushback and legal challenges, according to local reporting.

The surge in ICE activity follows the Jan. 7 killing of Renée Good by an ICE agent in north Minneapolis and has drawn sustained opposition from community groups and state and local officials.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem indicated that arrests are imminent in connection with a protest at a St. Paul church over the weekend, where demonstrators disrupted services to denounce the pastor’s reported role with ICE.

 

‘Really Troubling’: Bret Baier Speaks On Obama Russiagate Docs

Fox News anchor Bret Baier had a strong reaction after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s claims regarding the Obama administration — most notably her allegation that former President Barack Obama engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” against his successor, Donald Trump.

Advertisement

Baier offered more analysis on Gabbard’s comments at the White House briefing last week, where she detailed “evidence” that she claimed “points to” Obama’s role in fueling a narrative of collusion between Trump and Russia in the wake of the 2016 election.

Gabbard sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department days earlier and accused the Obama administration of trying to “subvert President Trump’s 2016 victory and presidency.”

“Well, I look forward to seeing that interview again, Bret. You know, one of the very interesting things here is the different way that Hillary Clinton was treated as opposed to President Trump. She received a defensive briefing. It seems that the highest bar was put in place in terms of any information that could be used against her. It also is revealed in this report that at one point in the process, they were looking at investigating her because they believed that she was sort of throwing all of this stuff about Russia out there, and this dossier out there, in order to cover up for the server investigation. So, at one point, they were looking into that closely; but then there’s this huge steer towards Trump with, according to these documents, a much lower bar that is needed for the credibility of the information that they’re going to corral and throw at him, correct?” Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum asked.

“Yeah, that’s exactly right. Now, this is the Trump investigation and this is what they’re putting out here. Separately, Chuck Grassley has put out these files on the Hillary Clinton email case — which are really eye-opening, as well — and a lot of it is redacted. But I talked about both of those things with Comey back in 2018. There was a major disparity,” Baier responded.

Advertisement

“And in the middle of this, you have the Page and Strzok, the two lovers at FBI, who are, they come out with these texts of how biased they are against President Trump; and they’re in charge of the investigation, of the interview of Hillary Clinton, of the BleachBit phones, of the interview and scheduling for Michael Flynn — then NSA director. And you see how this all kind of comes in together in a way that is — in hindsight, as you look at the big picture — really troubling. I think — listen, we are one of the only outlets that’s following this in-depth, kind of on the substance, as opposed to, again, a glancing blow; and I think it deserves that kind of coverage,” he added.

 

Carville: Ilhan Omar Should Leave Democratic Party, Do Her Own Thing

Democratic political strategist James Carville reiterated previous criticism of Ilhan Omar during a recent podcast appearance, again suggesting the progressive lawmaker should consider leaving the Democratic Party.

Advertisement

Carville made the remarks during an interview on Straight Shooter, hosted by Stephen A. Smith. Smith asked Carville about comments he made in May 2025 on his podcast, Politics War Room, in which he sharply criticized Omar, a member of the progressive group of lawmakers often referred to as “the Squad.”

Carville, who made a name for himself as an adviser to then-President Bill Clinton, indicated his views had not changed since the earlier remarks and again questioned Omar’s role within the Democratic Party.

His comments reflect ongoing divisions among Democrats over the party’s ideological direction and the influence of progressive lawmakers in Congress.

“Lady, why don’t you just get out of the Democratic Party,” Carville said about Omar. “Honestly, start your own movement.”

Advertisement

His initial calls for Omar to leave the party were in response to a 2018 interview she gave to Middle East outlet Al Jazeera. Omar, who is married to a white man, falsely said “our country should be more fearful of white men because they’re causing most of the deaths within this country.”

According to 2023 FBI and Justice Department crime statistics, while whites commit the most murders in terms of raw numbers, black males are six times more likely to victimize other blacks.

Advertisement

Carville stated that Omar was a “very, attractive, soft-spoken lady,” he didn’t agree on her attacks on white men, explicitly calling her to “stop.”

“About 33% of the people that are gonna vote are gonna be white males,” Carville said. “Well, it’s stupid to attack 33% of the voters!”

“And so what I would say to Congresswoman Omar, ‘Why don’t you be a Democratic Socialist of America?’ Do what AOC did, and then if they win, the truth of that is, I share a lot of ideological issues in common with Congressman Omar, but maybe you should do like a parliamentary government. We’ll let you in the governing coalition, but not the electoral coalition,” Carville said.

“But we cannot- we have to get this mentality out that we can win national elections [without] White people, because you can’t,” Carville continued. “That we can somehow or another win an election without white males. It’s just insanity. It’s literally mathematical insanity, cultural insanity.”

“All white people are not the same. All black people are not the same. All Hispanic people are not the same, all right? ” Carville added. “And I don’t like generalizing about someone’s gender or their race or their sexual preference or anything else. All gay people are not the same. They’re very different personalities. They’re very different values, very different everything.”

Omar faced backlash after falsely claiming the United States deliberately targets Muslim nations during Ramadan. “Iraq was attacked by the US during Ramadan and it is sickening to know that the US is again going to attack Iran during Ramadan,” Omar wrote on X as tensions escalated ahead of a U.S. strike on Iran.

“The US apparently loves to strike Muslim countries during Ramadan and I am convinced it isn’t what these countries have done to violate international law but about who they worship,” she added.

But critics noted what she said was categorically incorrect. Also, they argued that such rhetoric, delivered during an active military standoff, risks giving adversaries propaganda they can weaponize.

Under the Constitution, treason is narrowly defined as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Legal scholars have long noted that the “aid and comfort” standard requires intent and tangible support, not merely controversial speech.

 

AMERICA APPLAUDS THE PIMA SHERIFF! The nation is shaken by the latest announcement in the Nancy Guthrie case

After 33 days of fear, speculation, and few leads, investigators say they have finally reconstructed the events surrounding Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance. The breakthrough ended weeks of uncertainty and offered the first clear direction in the case.

During a crowded briefing, officials explained that a specialized task force quietly re-examined small pieces of evidence that had previously been overlooked. Investigators gathered fragments such as digital activity records, travel information, and surveillance footage.

At first, each clue appeared insignificant. However, when detectives connected them, the details began to reveal a pattern showing where Nancy traveled and who may have crossed paths with her before she disappeared.

Discover more

Online TV streaming services

Buy vitamins and supplements

Entertainment center

According to investigators, the new reconstruction outlines how she moved through several locations before vanishing. What once seemed like unrelated coincidences gradually formed a timeline that may explain how she remained missing for more than a month.

For Nancy’s family, the announcement brought mixed emotions. After weeks of uncertainty, they now have what officials describe as “the first outline of truth,” even though many questions remain.

Authorities emphasized that the investigation is still ongoing. Detectives are continuing to analyze evidence, conduct interviews, and review timelines to confirm the sequence of events. They also acknowledged the possibility of additional people being involved and admitted that some gaps in the story still need to be filled.

While the case is not fully solved, investigators say the mystery is beginning to take shape, replacing the terrifying unknown with a clearer understanding of what may have happened.